Who pays when a dog injures someone - the strict-liability statutes most states have and what they cover, the older "one-bite" rule that survives in the rest, negligence and leash-law claims that exist under either, the defenses of trespass and provocation, landlord and keeper liability, how homeowners' insurance responds, and the dangerous-dog proceedings that run alongside the civil claim.
Looking for a lawyer rather than a definition? Skip to the state-by-state list of Dog Bites & Animal Bites law firms.
A dog owner's liability for an injury the dog causes is set by state law, and the states fall into two camps. A majority have a dog-bite statute imposing strict liability: the owner is liable for a bite (in some states, any injury the dog causes) to a person who was in a public place or lawfully on private property, without proof that the owner knew the dog was dangerous or was careless in any way. The remaining states keep the common-law rule, often called the one-bite rule, under which the owner is liable only if they knew or should have known of the dog's dangerous propensity - a prior bite, prior aggressive behavior, or the dog's known temperament - so the first victim of a previously gentle dog may have no strict-liability claim. The label is loose: a dog that has lunged, snapped or been trained to attack can supply the knowledge without ever having bitten anyone.
Some examples of each camp: California, Florida, Illinois and Michigan have strict-liability dog-bite statutes, while Texas follows the one-bite rule, and New York imposes strict liability only where the owner knew or should have known of the dog's vicious propensities, with a separate statutory claim for medical costs caused by a dog already found dangerous. Each statute has its own scope (bites only, or any injury), its own defenses and, in some states, a reduced recovery when the victim was partly at fault, so the state where the injury happened decides the claim.
Negligence is available in most states regardless of the statute (New York is the main exception: its highest court held that an owner's liability for harm done by a domestic animal rests only on the vicious-propensity rule): an owner who let a dog run loose in violation of a leash ordinance, left a gate open, or failed to control a dog known to be excitable can be liable on ordinary principles, and violation of an animal-control ordinance is often negligence per se. Injuries other than bites - a person knocked down by a jumping dog, a cyclist who crashes avoiding one - are covered by some statutes and by negligence in the rest. Defenses are limited under a strict-liability statute: most exclude a trespasser, a person committing a crime on the property, and a person who provoked the dog, and many exclude injuries to veterinarians, groomers and kennel workers under an assumption-of-risk theory; comparative fault may reduce the recovery where the state applies it to strict-liability claims. A "keeper" or harborer who is not the owner - a person walking or boarding the dog, a household member - is liable under many statutes as if they were, and a landlord is generally not liable for a tenant's dog unless the landlord knew of the danger and had the power to remove the animal.
Most dog-bite claims are paid by the owner's homeowners' or renters' liability insurance, which is why the identity of the owner and their policy is the first thing established; some policies exclude particular breeds or dogs with a bite history, and some insurers cancel after a claim. Separately from the civil claim, animal-control authorities may open a dangerous-dog proceeding under a state statute or local ordinance, which can result in registration, muzzling and confinement requirements, liability insurance requirements, or euthanasia after notice and a hearing, and an owner whose dog was already declared dangerous faces enhanced civil liability and, in many states, criminal charges for a later attack. Breed-specific ordinances exist in some localities and are pre-empted by state law in others. Bites are reportable to public health authorities in every state for rabies control, and the animal-control report is usually the most useful contemporaneous evidence of what happened.
A person bitten by a dog should get the owner's name and address, report the bite to animal control, photograph the injuries as they heal, and see a lawyer before speaking to the owner's insurer, because the insurer's first questions - was the person on the property lawfully, did they provoke the dog - go straight to the statutory defenses. Owners should notify their insurer immediately and should not discuss fault with the victim. The rule in the state where the bite happened decides whether the claim requires proof of the dog's history, which is why the same bite can be an easy claim in one state and a difficult one across the border.
Worried about the cost? A lawyer can be hired for one part of a case only (limited-scope representation), may be paid from what a claim recovers (contingency fee), or may be free through a pro bono program or legal aid; a court can also waive its own filing fees.
Choose your state to see Dog Bites & Animal Bites law firms in the city where we list the most; your city may be under “other cities”, A to Z. A state marked “Accidents & Injuries” has no Dog Bites & Animal Bites listing yet and opens the broader page.
Other entries in the same area of law, each written from the same primary sources.