The right of a competent adult to refuse any treatment, including one that keeps them alive; what happens when the patient cannot decide; and the limits the law places on it.
Looking for a lawyer rather than a definition? Skip to the state-by-state list of Living Wills law firms.
A competent adult may refuse any medical treatment for any reason or none, including treatment without which they will die. That is the foundation of informed consent stated the other way round: treating a person without consent is a battery, and the Supreme Court has assumed that the Constitution protects a competent person's right to refuse unwanted medical treatment, including artificial nutrition and hydration. Religious refusals, refusals of blood, and refusals that doctors consider irrational are all within the right, provided the patient has the capacity to understand the decision and its consequences.
Capacity is the hinge. A patient who lacks it cannot exercise the right directly, and the question becomes who decides for them and on what evidence. A valid advance directive or a health care agent under a medical power of attorney speaks for the patient; failing those, state law names default surrogates and sets the standard they must apply. A state may require clear and convincing evidence of what an incapacitated patient would have wanted before life-sustaining treatment is withdrawn on a family member's say-so, and the Supreme Court has upheld that requirement. Capacity is decision-specific: a person may be able to decide about one treatment and not another, and a psychiatric diagnosis does not by itself remove it.
The limits are few but real. A parent's refusal of treatment for a child can be overridden by a court where the child's life or health is seriously at risk. A refusal in an emergency by a patient who cannot communicate is presumed not to exist, and treatment proceeds. Civil commitment and court-ordered treatment statutes allow involuntary treatment in defined circumstances, and prisons may treat under a narrower standard. And the right to refuse treatment is not a right to demand it: the Court has held there is no constitutional right to physician assistance in dying, leaving that to the states, a minority of which permit it by statute under conditions those statutes set.
A person who wants their refusal honored if they lose capacity should execute an advance directive and name a health care agent now, in the form their state recognizes - that document is what prevents the dispute, and a lawyer or a hospital's patient advocate can help complete it. A family facing a hospital that will not honor a refusal, or a hospital facing a family that disputes one, should get advice quickly; ethics committees resolve most such disagreements and courts the rest, and both work faster with the patient's wishes documented.
Worried about the cost? A lawyer can be hired for one part of a case only (limited-scope representation), may be paid from what a claim recovers (contingency fee), or may be free through a pro bono program or legal aid; a court can also waive its own filing fees.
Choose your state to see Living Wills law firms in the city where we list the most; your city may be under “other cities”, A to Z.
Entries on the same subject:
Other entries in the same area of law, each written from the same primary sources.